All results

Marine Care · Google Ads, Meta Ads, Amazon PPC · 7 years

Shurhold

Seven years on one account. Over the last two, spend rose 35% and revenue rose 44% — the extra money worked harder than the money already in the account, which is the opposite of what usually happens when you scale.

$112,278

Managed spend

$403,688

Revenue tracked

3.6x

Blended return

7 yrs

On the account

Shurhold

The account

Boring on purpose

Marine cleaning and detailing products, sold to boat owners. Monthly spend in the second year sat between $5,079 and $5,896 — a band of about 16%. That flatness is the result, not a missing chart.

$0 $1,875 $3,750 $5,625 $7,500 Sep 24: $1,479 spend, 4.0x Sep 24 Oct 24: $2,067 spend, 4.0x Nov 24: $2,080 spend, 4.3x Dec 24: $2,188 spend, 3.8x Dec 24 Jan 25: $2,323 spend, 4.4x Feb 25: $3,904 spend, 2.9x Mar 25: $6,089 spend, 3.5x Mar 25 Apr 25: $4,809 spend, 4.1x May 25: $4,816 spend, 3.3x Jun 25: $7,013 spend, 2.8x Jun 25 Jul 25: $6,156 spend, 3.5x Aug 25: $4,950 spend, 3.0x Sep 25: $5,132 spend, 3.0x Sep 25 Oct 25: $5,190 spend, 2.2x Nov 25: $5,436 spend, 3.5x Dec 25: $5,264 spend, 3.5x Dec 25 Jan 26: $5,220 spend, 2.9x Feb 26: $5,158 spend, 2.9x Mar 26: $5,163 spend, 4.5x Mar 26 Apr 26: $5,832 spend, 5.1x May 26: $5,669 spend, 4.8x Jun 26: $5,365 spend, 5.1x Jun 26 Jul 26: $5,896 spend, 3.3x Aug 26: $5,079 spend, 3.1x 0x 2x 4x 6x 8x
Bars are monthly spend against the left axis. The line is return on ad spend against the right axis. Source: the Google Ads account, September 2024 to August 2026.

The numbers

Efficiency improved while scaling, not despite it

Year one: $47,874 of spend returned $165,556, a 3.5x return. Year two: $64,404 returned $238,132, a 3.7x return. Spend rose 35% and revenue rose 44% — revenue grew faster than spend, which is the whole claim.

Why did adding spend work here?

Because the account had headroom it was not using. The extra $16,530 brought in $72,576, a marginal return of 4.4x against a 3.6x blended average. When the marginal figure sits above the average, the account was under-funded rather than over-extended, and the right move is more budget, not better targeting.

That is the single most useful diagnostic I run, and it points in opposite directions on two accounts I manage at the same time. On The Lifeguard Store the marginal return came in far below the average, which said the opposite: that account was buying the expensive end of its demand. Same question, same arithmetic, contradictory answers — which is why it gets asked per account rather than assumed.

The unglamorous part

  • Seven years is the interesting number, and it is not a performance metric. It means the account got attention in the quiet quarters, which is most of them.
  • This is not a turnaround story. Nothing was broken. The work was keeping a working account working while it grew, which sells badly and pays well.
  • A 3.6x return suits this margin structure. It would be a poor result for a brand with different economics. Return targets are set by gross margin and repeat rate, not by what another store reports.

What this involved

Google Ads

Meta Ads

Amazon PPC

Retention

Want the same look at your account?

I audit the account before either of us commits to anything, and you keep the audit whether or not you hire me. Pricing is published on the homepage.