All results

Aquatics Retail · Google Ads · 24 months

The Lifeguard Store

Scaled a seasonal aquatics retailer from $1,513 to $14,597 a month in ad spend over two years at a 17.5x blended return — and watched the return fall from 22.6x to 14.5x doing it. Both halves of that sentence matter.

$159,235

Managed spend

$2.8M

Revenue tracked

17.5x

Blended return

9,260

Conversions

The Lifeguard Store

The account

A seasonal business, and the season is spring

Lifeguard and aquatics equipment sells when pools open. Demand concentrates in March to June and thins out from September. Every number below moves with that, and reading any single month against the one before it will mislead you.

$0 $3,750 $7,500 $11,250 $15,000 Sep 24: $1,513 spend, 26.4x Sep 24 Oct 24: $2,265 spend, 25.9x Nov 24: $1,763 spend, 27.9x Dec 24: $2,008 spend, 25.2x Dec 24 Jan 25: $2,307 spend, 31.4x Feb 25: $3,941 spend, 23.3x Mar 25: $4,697 spend, 23.9x Mar 25 Apr 25: $5,066 spend, 37.7x May 25: $8,820 spend, 35.2x Jun 25: $10,398 spend, 16.0x Jun 25 Jul 25: $8,265 spend, 10.9x Aug 25: $7,204 spend, 11.1x Sep 25: $8,367 spend, 9.5x Sep 25 Oct 25: $8,462 spend, 7.7x Nov 25: $7,945 spend, 9.7x Dec 25: $8,320 spend, 8.2x Dec 25 Jan 26: $8,202 spend, 6.8x Feb 26: $4,577 spend, 9.6x Mar 26: $5,426 spend, 24.6x Mar 26 Apr 26: $9,382 spend, 29.2x May 26: $14,597 spend, 23.9x Jun 26: $9,307 spend, 16.6x Jun 26 Jul 26: $9,051 spend, 11.9x Aug 26: $7,354 spend, 8.3x 0x 10x 20x 30x 40x
Bars are monthly spend against the left axis. The line is return on ad spend against the right axis. Source: the Google Ads account, September 2024 to August 2026. Conversion value is Google Ads’ own attribution.

The numbers

What two years actually bought

Year one: $58,246 of spend returned $1,313,541, a 22.6x return. Year two: $100,989 returned $1,468,160, a 14.5x return. Spend rose 73% and revenue rose 12%.

So what did the extra spend actually return?

3.6x, against a blended average of 17.5x. The second year cost $42,743 more than the first and brought in $154,619 more — divide one by the other and that is the return on the money that was added, not on the money that was already working. It is the number that decides whether to keep scaling, and it is almost never the number in the dashboard.

A 3.6x marginal return is still a good business for most stores. It is also a very different business from 22.6x, and a budget conversation that uses the blended figure will get the decision wrong.

Before you read too much into this

  • Year on year is not like for like. Two years of a seasonal account overlap with price changes, stock, and whatever the competition did. The marginal figure is arithmetic on real totals, not a controlled experiment.
  • Conversion value is Google’s attribution. It is the number the platform optimises against, so it is the right one for judging the platform — and the wrong one for judging the business. Those are different questions.
  • A falling return is not automatically a failure. It is what buying more of a finite pool of demand costs. The failure would be not knowing it was happening.

What this involved

Google Ads

Shopping

Merchant Center

Scaling

Want the same look at your account?

I audit the account before either of us commits to anything, and you keep the audit whether or not you hire me. Pricing is published on the homepage.